Someone at Camp, looks forward to a dialogue between the Left and Ecology Freedom and the Democratic Party, someone else thinks of better times to return it, others do not think at all. While waiting for the clouds
diradino or, conversely, increasingly thicken, let's understand what we mean by dialogue. " Is the formal act of sitting at the same table to bargain and negotiate? Or is it the result of a process sharing of ideas and choices, general and particular? To us it seems the most appropriate way to interpret the issue: a dialogue that is not designed to get (on the one hand positions, on the other guarantees) but to share (values \u200b\u200band perspectives).
It turns out, however, that it is precisely the way most inaccessible and impractical. Why? For entanglements and obstacles in terms of sharing those interposed captiously than dialogue, as we said, we do not think at all and are determined to avert it: the "far left" of Sel, as some maliciously branded with the likes awkward purpose to discredit us, it is good that it remains safe and all'angolino. Apparently for them the priority is not the health of the city center.
The real trouble is that the Democratic Party, to date, has not yet decided whether to open a season of renewal for fields or continue to get by without method, at the mercy of improvisation and the conservative forces inside the majority, I pay to stay, to name but not actually at the helm of the city. In addition, continue to praise the skills of those who managed to bring the government of the city center, as you continue to binge in some quarters all'autoreferenzialismo voted, it means creating a disturbing previous sufficient condition for the future skipper of the center, If anything, there will be one, will be to "know how to win," no matter how and with whom. It seems to me that this is not politics but simple logistics.
guidance navigation, in addition, you are unable to plan long-flung operations that take root and sintonizzino with the thinking of a community: it is intended to be perceived as more and more people complain, as distant and closed.
the organizational restructuring of the Foundation of the City Paper offers the latest example of how this policy is guided by the municipal administration "unless we are, we are better": the choices seem to be more a projection of the desires of the few, rather than be the result of a general will and higher needs. Shared more choices and participate in, usually, are more robust and durable and, above all, and elevated the administrative action of a majority, although not all its members are ready to sign, it says "center."
is time for the Democratic Party reoriented its political conduct, will encourage the administration to enable the best resources likely to start a real season of renewal, until now invisible, to Fields. But most importantly it is time that we start writing a new page, less ambiguous and dark, the center room.
Emanuele Act
by Campintesta , November 2010
diradino or, conversely, increasingly thicken, let's understand what we mean by dialogue. " Is the formal act of sitting at the same table to bargain and negotiate? Or is it the result of a process sharing of ideas and choices, general and particular? To us it seems the most appropriate way to interpret the issue: a dialogue that is not designed to get (on the one hand positions, on the other guarantees) but to share (values \u200b\u200band perspectives).
It turns out, however, that it is precisely the way most inaccessible and impractical. Why? For entanglements and obstacles in terms of sharing those interposed captiously than dialogue, as we said, we do not think at all and are determined to avert it: the "far left" of Sel, as some maliciously branded with the likes awkward purpose to discredit us, it is good that it remains safe and all'angolino. Apparently for them the priority is not the health of the city center.
The real trouble is that the Democratic Party, to date, has not yet decided whether to open a season of renewal for fields or continue to get by without method, at the mercy of improvisation and the conservative forces inside the majority, I pay to stay, to name but not actually at the helm of the city. In addition, continue to praise the skills of those who managed to bring the government of the city center, as you continue to binge in some quarters all'autoreferenzialismo voted, it means creating a disturbing previous sufficient condition for the future skipper of the center, If anything, there will be one, will be to "know how to win," no matter how and with whom. It seems to me that this is not politics but simple logistics.
guidance navigation, in addition, you are unable to plan long-flung operations that take root and sintonizzino with the thinking of a community: it is intended to be perceived as more and more people complain, as distant and closed.
the organizational restructuring of the Foundation of the City Paper offers the latest example of how this policy is guided by the municipal administration "unless we are, we are better": the choices seem to be more a projection of the desires of the few, rather than be the result of a general will and higher needs. Shared more choices and participate in, usually, are more robust and durable and, above all, and elevated the administrative action of a majority, although not all its members are ready to sign, it says "center."
is time for the Democratic Party reoriented its political conduct, will encourage the administration to enable the best resources likely to start a real season of renewal, until now invisible, to Fields. But most importantly it is time that we start writing a new page, less ambiguous and dark, the center room.
Emanuele Act
by Campintesta , November 2010
0 comments:
Post a Comment