Pierpaolo Warriors
Before obscenity of modern times, a this "anthropological disaster " landlocked product from politics, to remain inert and impassive is an affront over all limits of decency and endurance , a ' unacceptable affront to human dignity even more than politics. But the violent protest in Rome on 14 December last, that form of rebellion without a "head", in all its symbolic value, is only a real threat to the opposition, heavily damaged the construction of a political left, valid and responsible , who is thinking seriously of the country, which aims to send home Berlusconi and his cronies and to govern. As a result creates a paradox unbearable : fat consent Berlusconi in his political moment more difficult. The story of Rome, as feasible scheme of revolt, however, shows some elements of reflection and critical function to a more careful analysis of the phenomenon itself.
First is configured as a threat of violent solutions, albeit sporadic, confused and disorganized , a deep social crisis, that this majority has not been able to give concrete answers. Secondly, it is clear how the irrational act of rebellion of a minority that can not be and interpret a deep and widespread social and political embarrassment, it is true, can not find room for action and effective forms of expression. It also has the hallmarks of a movement immature, lacking in subjectivity policy, a hybrid of some anti-historical antagonism urban areas and trained groups of ultras tifo football.
not therefore any comparison with the 70 because they do not perceive tangible signs of degeneration , because they lack critical thinking skills, there can be no "mass effect" is totally absent from any meeting and dialogue with the social partners in the country. It works together instead vote of no confidence in Berlusconi , discrediting and posing a serious difficulty in, and within minutes, the right and necessary challenge the student movement, distracting the public from the actual event: the death throes of a political regime to collapse, the last days of dying satrap.
The nature of the protest in Rome and the causes that gave rise to it is much discussed and written about. The predominant thesis in the analysis of that period was, however, that the anger of a generation without a future, modern proletarian rebels who revolted against a 'Italy beset by uncertainty "( Future) and" break loneliness and subordination "(The poster ). Instead there was the impression that most young men broke Anything 'and that more than a rebellious proletariat in action was the rebellion of some hoodlum a government that has introduced a "card of the fan." Not prohibit the government to collect the confidence of Parliament, nor to approve the reform university as a Christmas present.
It certainly would not want there to be recorded in Italy since the aftermath of the French May 's Humanité "every barricade, every car have burned tens of thousands of votes in the Gaullist party."
should reverse the question and not confuse improvisation with the creation of a political consciousness and new forms of organization and participation, to prevent an undeniable social rage to vent through the violence and allow it to expressed through an organized movement, and organic unity to protest and change .
by Campintesta , February 2011
0 comments:
Post a Comment