The closure of the San Pio sanctioned in 2004 by Lease and now confirmed, despite himself, by Vendola, has raised many controversies. What is surprising is that such arguments seem to affect most political circles that citizenship. It would seem that people have very clear that the decision of the junta Vendola not suit the present situation of the hospital, which since 2004 has been everything except a hospital (had only twenty beds in the medical department and a small department of psychiatry). Not else can you explain why, contrary to what happened to Mottola, Massafra Cisternino and almost all the efforts made at fields have seen a lack of public participation and high turnout of politicians. In particular, the mayors of fields, and Squinzano Trepuzzi seem to be at the forefront of a battle against Vendola and flowers, which calls for the reopening of the four basic departments.
While it is true that in 2009 Vendola announced the reopening of the hospital field, the other must be admitted that from 2009 to today the situation is completely changed. The drastic cut of the transfer of resources and the fall in bed imposed by the national government, forced to revise the commissioner Fiore those who were its targets.
Moreover, the same administrators Fields, after this election, with a letter written by Deputy Mayor Pagliardini announced that, given the financial situation inherited from the previous administration, would be forced to relinquish many of their points election program. In other words, since the money does not exist and that the beds should be reduced, something must be cut.
The mayors of fields, and Squinzano Trepuzzi, which are long-running politicians should explain what they would do them, explain that if they would choose to reopen a closed hospital for seven years or close another currently active and well-functioning as a cover. Or maybe you would choose to reduce the number of beds at the Vito Fazzi?
E 'is quite clear that the position of the three mayors is absolutely instrumental . It 'obvious that the mayor of Squinzano's interest to attack a political council of a different color, although squinzanesi citizens are served well-back from the hospital of St. Peter. It 'all too evident then that the mayor of Trepassey's interest to revive the faded image of his administration on the eve of the vote in local elections in order to facilitate the future candidate for mayor of his coalition, as it is clear that the mayor of fields have the interest to shift the attention of the citizens on the hospital to hide the inaction of his administration.
All three have their own benefit, therefore, it exploited the "question of the hospital," but they also know perfectly well that with the criteria and cuts imposed by the Berlusconi government, the reopening of the hospital is very difficult .
Perhaps it would be better for the whole if our directors, rather than exploit the question, did a concrete proposal, such as Environment and Freedom Left: strengthen clinics and 118, create a service first responders 24 hours at 24, rationalizing expenditure related to health ASL transferring all locations in the area Fields of Salento in a single public structure.
by Campintesta , February 2011
0 comments:
Post a Comment